Fat transfer (lipofilling, autologous fat grafting) uses a patient’s own adipose tissue to restore or augment volume in the face, breasts, buttocks or hands. Fat is harvested by gentle liposuction, processed, and re-injected through fine cannulas. Because the graft is autologous, rejection is not a concern, and contours can be refined at the same time as donor-site reshaping.
Fat transfer — also called lipofilling, autologous fat grafting, or lipofilling transplantation — is a plastic surgery technique in which adipose tissue is harvested from one area of the body (typically the abdomen, flanks, thighs, or hips), purified, and re-injected as a soft-tissue filler into another region that needs volume restoration or augmentation. Because the graft comes from the patient’s own body, it is biocompatible and carries no risk of allergic rejection, unlike synthetic fillers or implants.
The core principle is that a portion of the transferred fat establishes a new blood supply (neovascularization) at the recipient site and survives long-term as living tissue. The remaining fat is absorbed by the body during the first 3-6 months. Published meta-analyses report long-term fat survival in the range of approximately 40-80% depending on anatomical region, harvesting method, processing technique, and injection protocol (Gir et al., Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012; Strong et al., PRS Global Open, 2015). Because of partial resorption, touch-up sessions are sometimes planned.
Fat grafting has become one of the most widely performed procedures in plastic surgery, endorsed by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) for a range of reconstructive and aesthetic indications. It can be used on its own or combined with liposuction body contouring, breast reconstruction, or facial rejuvenation procedures.
Fat transfer may be considered when a patient presents with, or seeks correction of, one or more of the following:
A surgical consultation assesses donor-site fat availability, recipient-site tissue quality, skin elasticity, BMI stability, and general health. Patients with very low body fat, unstable weight, active smoking, uncontrolled diabetes, or bleeding disorders may not be suitable candidates or may require preoperative optimization.
Fat transfer is performed in three sequential stages — harvest, processing, and re-injection — during the same operative session.
1. Harvest. The donor area (abdomen, flanks, inner or outer thighs, hips, or back) is infiltrated with a tumescent solution containing diluted local anesthetic and adrenaline to minimize bleeding. Fat is then aspirated using low-pressure liposuction through small cannulas (typically 2-4 mm in diameter). Low-negative-pressure technique and small-bore cannulas are preferred because excessive suction pressure damages adipocytes and reduces graft survival (Coleman technique and subsequent refinements).
2. Processing. The harvested lipoaspirate contains fat, blood, oil, and tumescent fluid. Before re-injection, it is purified using one or a combination of:
3. Re-injection. The purified fat is transferred into small-gauge blunt-tip cannulas (typically 1-2 mm) and injected as micro-parcels along multiple tunnels and tissue planes. The “small aliquot, multi-pass” principle maximizes contact between grafted fat and surrounding vascularized tissue, improving survival. Typical volumes range from approximately 5-15 mL per side for facial fat grafting, 150-400 mL per breast, and 300-800+ mL per buttock in BBL cases.
Anesthesia depends on the extent of the procedure. Small-volume facial or hand grafting can be performed under local anesthesia with sedation; breast lipofilling, BBL, and combined liposuction-plus-transfer cases are typically performed under general or regional anesthesia. Operative time ranges from approximately 1 hour for an isolated facial procedure to 3-4 hours for a large combined liposuction-plus-BBL case. Most cases are same-day discharge or a single overnight stay.
Micro-volume lipofilling to restore age-related loss in the midface, temples, tear troughs, nasolabial folds, chin, and lips. Typically 5-30 mL total. Often performed with local anesthesia and sedation, and may be combined with blepharoplasty or a facelift for complete facial rejuvenation.
Implant-free volume augmentation or correction of mild asymmetry using the patient’s own fat. Typical volumes are 150-400 mL per breast per session; one or two sessions may be needed depending on skin envelope and desired size. Also used to improve contour around existing implants or after lumpectomy.
Transfer of fat (typically 300-800+ mL per side) harvested from the abdomen, flanks, and thighs into the gluteal region to reshape and project the buttock. Contemporary practice follows the Multi-Society Gluteal Fat Grafting Task Force / MASS-BSAS safety protocol: injection is kept strictly in the subcutaneous plane, cannulas are held parallel to the skin, and injection into or deep to the gluteal muscle is avoided to reduce the risk of fat embolism.
Small-volume lipofilling (approximately 10-20 mL per hand) into the dorsum of the hand to restore soft-tissue padding over tendons and veins, giving a smoother and younger appearance. Frequently combined with facial fat grafting.
Single-stage body contouring in which liposuction reshapes the abdomen, flanks, thighs, or back and the aspirated fat is simultaneously re-injected into the breasts, buttocks, or hips. This tier suits patients who want both donor-site reduction and recipient-site enhancement in one operative session.
Recovery has two parallel components: the donor (liposuction) site and the recipient (grafted) site. Bruising and swelling are expected at both, peaking within the first 3-5 days and settling substantially over 2-4 weeks. The final graft volume is typically assessed at 3-6 months, once resorption has stabilized.
Smoking cessation for at least 4 weeks before and after surgery is strongly recommended, as nicotine impairs microcirculation and reduces graft survival. Post-operative follow-up visits typically occur at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Fat grafting is generally considered a safe procedure in appropriately selected patients, but — like all surgery — it carries risks. Rates below are reported in peer-reviewed literature and society guidance; individual risk depends on anatomy, volume grafted, and surgical protocol.
Common, generally self-limiting:
Less common:
BBL-specific: fat embolism. Gluteal fat grafting has historically carried the highest mortality of any cosmetic procedure when fat is injected deep to, or into, the gluteal muscle, because fat can enter the gluteal veins and travel to the lungs and heart (macroscopic fat embolism). A 2017 international survey by the ASPS/ASERF Gluteal Fat Grafting Task Force reported a mortality rate of approximately 1 in 3,000 BBL procedures in that historical cohort, the highest of any aesthetic operation (Mofid et al., Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2017).
In response, the Multi-Society Gluteal Fat Grafting Task Force (ASPS, ASERF, ASAPS, ISAPS, IFATS) issued formal safety advisories in 2018 and updated statements thereafter. The core protocol:
Follow-up studies after the 2018 advisory and subsequent ultrasound-guided protocols have reported a significant reduction in BBL fat-embolism mortality in compliant practices (e.g., Cansancao et al., PRS Global Open, 2019; Del Vecchio et al., Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2020). Confirming that the surgeon follows the current Task Force subcutaneous-only protocol — and operates in an accredited facility — is therefore central to BBL safety.
Patients should discuss their personal risk profile, comorbidities, medication list (especially anticoagulants), and smoking status with the surgical team during the preoperative consultation.
Published meta-analyses report long-term fat survival in the approximate range of 40-80%, depending on the anatomical region, the harvesting and processing technique, and the recipient tissue quality (Gir et al., 2012; Strong et al., 2015). The most active resorption occurs in the first 3-6 months; the volume that remains at 6-12 months is usually stable long-term, behaving like native fat (it can gain or lose volume if the patient’s body weight changes significantly).
In the breast, fat grafting can deliver a natural-feeling, implant-free result with a modest increase in size (commonly up to one cup per session) provided the patient has enough donor fat. It cannot match the degree of projection or upper-pole fullness achievable with a silicone implant, and it typically requires one or two sessions to reach the desired volume. For the buttock, fat grafting (BBL) is the main volumizing option; gluteal implants carry their own higher complication profile. A surgical consultation is the right forum to weigh implants versus fat for a given anatomy.
BBL has historically had the highest mortality of any cosmetic procedure, driven by macroscopic fat embolism when fat was injected into or under the gluteal muscle — an estimated mortality of approximately 1 in 3,000 procedures in the 2017 ASPS/ASERF survey. Since the 2018 Multi-Society Gluteal Fat Grafting Task Force advisory, the recommended protocol is strictly subcutaneous injection with the cannula parallel to the skin, ideally with intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Practices that follow this protocol and operate in an accredited facility have reported a significant reduction in fat-embolism mortality. The procedure should only be performed by a board-certified plastic surgeon who explicitly follows the current Task Force safety protocol.
Small-volume areas (face, hands) are commonly completed in a single session. Larger-volume areas (breast, buttock) may be completed in one session for modest goals or split into two sessions spaced approximately 3-6 months apart when the targeted volume exceeds what can be safely grafted at once, or when maximizing graft survival is a priority. The exact plan is set in consultation based on anatomy and goals.
Yes — in fact, this is the most common configuration. Liposuction of the abdomen, flanks, thighs, hips, or back supplies the fat that is then re-injected into the recipient area (breast, buttock, face, hands). A single operative session can therefore reshape the donor contour and augment the recipient area simultaneously. Suitability depends on available donor fat, recipient-tissue quality, overall fitness for a longer operation, and the volume being moved.
Only guests who have booked can leave a review.
G - Genital System, L - Musculoskeletal, S - Skin